Sanction or Sanctions in place

When discussing the regulation of aged care services in Australia, the term "sanction" holds serious weight. For aged care providers, receiving a sanction is a clear indication of failure to meet required quality and safety standards. For residents and their families, understanding what a sanction is and what it means is fundamental to knowing their rights and the regulatory framework that governs care quality.

What is a Sanction in Aged Care?

In the Australian aged care system, sanctions are formal, regulatory actions taken by the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (the Commission) against an Approved Provider. These actions follow serious non-compliance with the requirements set out in the Aged Care Act 1997 or the Aged Care Quality Standards.

The purpose of a sanction is not merely punitive. It acts as a powerful measure to force immediate and effective rectification of the identified issues, putting the safety and wellbeing of residents first. A provider is given a sanction only after earlier steps, such as a Notice to Remedy (NTR), have failed to bring the provider back into compliance, or if the failure is severe enough to warrant immediate action.

The Compliance Pathway to a Sanction

Before a sanction is placed, a provider typically goes through several compliance steps. When the Commission identifies issues during an assessment or investigation, it may issue an NTR. This notice formally warns the provider about the compliance failures and gives them a specific timeframe to demonstrate how they plan to fix the problems.

If the provider fails to satisfy the requirements of the NTR, or if the Commission concludes that the provider poses an immediate and unacceptable risk to care recipients, the Commission may issue a Notice of Decision to Impose Sanction. This decision signifies that the provider has failed in their fundamental responsibilities.

What Does a Sanction Involve?

When a sanction is imposed, it introduces specific conditions that the provider must meet for a set period. These conditions are designed to address the compliance failures directly and can significantly restrict the provider's operations.

Common conditions of sanctions include:

Restriction on Admissions

One of the most frequent conditions is restricting the provider's approval to accept new residents. This is a severe step that stops the growth of the facility and gives existing staff and management time to focus entirely on fixing the existing shortcomings without adding new pressures.

Restriction on Admissions

Financial and Management Conditions

The sanction may restrict the provider’s ability to charge government subsidies for new residents, or in some cases, require them to repay previously received fees or subsidies related to the period of non-compliance. Furthermore, the provider is often required to appoint an expert adviser, at their own expense, to assist in rectifying the issues and making changes to management and operations.

Mandatory Training and Support

Sanctions frequently require the provider to arrange specific training for staff and managers concerning the areas where non-compliance occurred, such as clinical care, incident management, or quality systems. This training must assist with achieving sustained compliance in providing services.

The Impact of Sanctions on Providers and Residents

For the Approved Provider, receiving a sanction results in public notification, reputational damage, financial strain due to restrictions and required improvements, and a substantial commitment of resources to return to compliance.

For residents and their families, the imposition of a sanction signals that the government regulator has officially recognised and is addressing serious failures in care. While concerning, it confirms that regulatory action is underway. The conditions imposed, such as mandatory expert assistance and improved staff training, are intended to quickly improve the quality of services and protect the safety and wellbeing of those receiving care.

If a provider fails to meet the sanction conditions, the Commission holds the power to withdraw the provider's Approved Provider status entirely, meaning they would no longer be eligible to deliver government-funded aged care services. This demonstrates the serious nature of sanctions as a final regulatory enforcement tool.

Sanctions are a necessary mechanism within the aged care quality framework. They represent the final consequence of non-compliance and serve as a powerful safeguard for older Australians receiving care. They hold providers accountable and drive continuous improvement in safety and quality across the sector.

Frequently Asked Questions About Aged Care Sanctions

How long does a sanction typically last?

A sanction is imposed for a specific period, often six months, but the duration can vary depending on the severity of the non-compliance and the time required for the provider to meet all the conditions set by the Commission. The provider must satisfy the Commission that they have resolved the issues before the sanction is lifted.

What happens if an aged care provider fails to fix the issues after a sanction is placed?

If the provider does not meet the conditions of the sanction within the specified timeframe, the Commission can take further regulatory action. This may include extending the period of the sanction, or in the most serious cases, revoking the provider's approval to deliver government-funded aged care services.

How do I find out if a facility has a sanction in place?

Information about sanctions is made public by the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission. They maintain a register of compliance and enforcement decisions, which includes details on current and recently expired sanctions against Approved Providers. This information is available to the public.

Does a sanction mean residents must move out?

No. A sanction is directed at the provider and their operations, not at the residents. The conditions imposed, such as restricting new admissions, are designed to improve the quality and safety for existing residents. Residents are protected, and the provider remains responsible for delivering services to them while the sanction is in effect.

More Glossary items

War widow and widower pensions provide vital financial support to the surviving partners of veterans. These government payments are generally non-taxable and are treated differently in aged care assessments, often reducing or eliminating means-tested care fees for residential or home care services. Understanding how these pensions interact with aged care fees can help recipients plan their finances and maintain access to essential services.
This guide explains aged care support options for Australian veterans and war widows/widowers. It covers eligibility for government-funded aged care services, access to Department of Veterans' Affairs (DVA) support, and how pensions affect aged care fees. The article highlights the importance of recognising the unique needs of this group to ensure respectful and appropriate care.
The System Governor plays a vital role in Australia’s aged care system, overseeing service quality, continuity, and fair access for older Australians. This post explains its responsibilities, including policy development, provider accountability, and initiatives like Star Ratings, ensuring that aged care services are reliable, safe, and equitable.
Substitute decision-making is used when an older person can no longer make important decisions on their own. A substitute decision-maker steps in to make choices about medical treatment, personal care, and living arrangements. Their role is to follow the person’s known wishes or act in their best interests when those wishes are not clear. Families can plan ahead by legally appointing someone they trust, and any valid Advance Care Directive must be followed. Understanding how substitute decision-making works helps ensure the person’s rights, preferences, and wellbeing remain at the centre of care.
Supported decision making is a rights-based approach that helps you stay in control of your life as you receive aged care services. Instead of others making choices for you, this approach focuses on giving you the information, tools, and support you need to make your own decisions. This support can come from family members, friends, or independent advocates who help you understand options and express your preferences.
The Aged Care Statement of Rights outlines the protections every older person can expect when receiving funded aged care services in Australia. It affirms core rights such as independence, choice, equitable access, quality and safe care, privacy, and clear communication. The Statement also ensures that individuals can speak up, provide feedback, or make complaints without fear of unfair treatment. For providers, it establishes clear responsibilities to act in line with these rights and demonstrate genuine understanding in daily practice. This framework places the dignity, identity, and preferences of the older person at the centre of all care decisions.
Self-advocacy is the ability to speak up for your needs, preferences, and rights when receiving aged care. It helps maintain autonomy, ensure quality services, and improve communication with care providers. By asking questions, expressing preferences, raising concerns, and keeping simple records, individuals can take an active role in directing their care. When extra support is needed, family, friends, or independent advocates can help ensure the person’s voice remains central to all decisions.
A Registered Supporter is a formally recognised role under the new Australian Aged Care Act. This role helps an older person understand information, explore their options, and communicate their decisions about aged care services. The supporter does not make decisions on behalf of the person. Instead, they strengthen the older person’s ability to make their own choices. The Registered Supporter may request information from providers, explain options, and assist the older person in expressing their preferences. The role is overseen by the System Governor to ensure transparency, accountability, and protection of the older person’s rights.