Conflict of Interest: Meaning and Use in Aged Care

A conflict of interest arises when a person or organization has multiple interests—one of which could corrupt the motivation for an act in the other. In the context of Aged Care, this situation typically involves a clash between the professional duty to provide high-quality, person-centered care to an older person, and a secondary personal or financial interest that could improperly influence that duty.

The presence of a conflict does not automatically mean wrongdoing has occurred, but it creates a risk that decisions will be biased, potentially leading to poorer outcomes for the care recipient or misuse of government funding. Aged Care providers and their staff must maintain the trust of residents, families, and the community by actively identifying and managing these conflicts.

Why Conflicts of Interest are Important in Aged Care

The Aged Care sector operates under a principle of putting the care recipient first. Because older Australians receiving care are often vulnerable, any deviation from this principle due to conflicting interests can have serious consequences, including:

• Substandard Care: Decisions about care, services, or equipment might be based on cost savings or profit rather than the resident's best needs.
• Financial Mismanagement: Misdirection of funds or improper charging for services that benefit the provider more than the client.
• Loss of Trust: Residents and their families lose confidence in the provider's ability to act impartially.

The regulatory environment, including the Aged Care Quality Standards, places a strong requirement on providers to have robust governance systems in place to address these issues transparently.

Common Types of Conflicts in Aged Care

Conflicts of interest can be direct or indirect, actual, potential, or perceived. They frequently fall into these categories:

1. Financial Conflicts

This is perhaps the most obvious type. It occurs when an individual or the organization stands to gain monetarily from a specific decision.

• Example: A facility manager receiving a commission for directing residents to an in-house pharmacy or pathology service, even if a cheaper or better external option exists.
• Example: A provider owning or having a financial relationship with a supplier of food, laundry, or medical equipment, creating an incentive to use that supplier regardless of quality or cost efficiency.

2. Non-Financial Conflicts (Personal or Professional)

These conflicts involve relationships or duties that are not strictly about money but can still improperly sway judgment.

• Example: A staff member caring for a family member or close friend in the facility. While common, this requires careful monitoring to prevent preferential treatment or boundary issues.
• Example: A board member of an Aged Care provider also serving on the board of a community advocacy group that frequently critiques the industry.

3. Duty Conflicts

This occurs when an individual has responsibilities to two or more parties, and those duties clash.

• Example: A staff member working for both the Aged Care provider and a consulting firm that audits the provider's compliance.

Effective Management Strategies

Managing conflicts of interest requires more than just disclosure; it needs systematic policies and procedures. Providers should adopt a three-step approach:

1. Identification and Disclosure

All employees, management, and board members must routinely disclose any actual, potential, or perceived conflicts. Disclosure forms should be mandatory upon hiring and reviewed annually. Honesty and transparency are key components of this process.

2. Assessment and Recording

Once a conflict is disclosed, the provider must formally assess the risk it poses to the organization and, more importantly, to the residents. This assessment should determine how significant the conflict is and what corrective measures are needed. A register of all conflicts and their management plans should be maintained.

3. Mitigation and Control

Management plans must detail specific actions taken to reduce or remove the conflict.

• Avoidance: In some cases, the best course is to remove the conflict entirely, such as ending a relationship with a conflicted supplier.
• Restriction: Limiting the conflicted person's involvement in the decision-making process. For instance, requiring a board member with a financial interest in a building contract to leave the room when that contract is discussed or voted on.
• Independent Review: Requiring high-risk decisions to be reviewed and approved by an impartial party or committee.

By taking these proactive steps, Aged Care providers demonstrate accountability and maintain focus on the welfare of the people they serve.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: What is the difference between an actual and a potential conflict of interest?

An actual conflict of interest currently exists and is influencing a decision. A potential conflict of interest is a situation where a conflict may arise in the future if certain circumstances change or if a decision is made. Both types must be disclosed and managed.

Q2: Are gifts considered a conflict of interest?

Yes, they can be. Gifts or hospitality offered to staff by suppliers or families can create a perceived or actual conflict. Most organizations have policies setting strict limits on the monetary value of gifts that can be accepted, or they require all gifts to be declined.

Q3: Who is responsible for managing conflicts of interest in an Aged Care organization?

While the governing body (Board or CEO) holds the ultimate responsibility for setting up appropriate governance systems, every employee, from front-line staff to senior management, has a duty to identify, disclose, and cooperate in managing conflicts that affect their work.

‍