What Was the Aged Care Approvals Round (ACAR)?

ACAR was the annual competitive application process used by the Australian Government to allocate subsidized aged care places and capital grants to approved providers.

Detailed Explanation

For many years, the Australian aged care system operated on a "supply-driven" model. This meant the government strictly controlled the supply of aged care services to ensure costs remained manageable and services were distributed across different geographic regions. The mechanism used to control this supply was the Aged Care Approvals Round.

Each year, the Department of Health would assess the needs of the aging population in various planning regions. Based on this data, they would release a specific number of new "places" (funded beds) available for allocation. Aged care providers then had to compete for these places.

The process typically followed these steps:

1. Announcement: The government announced how many residential aged care places, short-term restorative care places, and capital grants were available in each region.
2. Application: Approved providers submitted detailed proposals. These applications had to demonstrate the provider's financial viability, quality of care, and ability to meet the specific needs of the region.
3. Assessment: The department assessed applications against specific criteria.
4. Allocation: Successful providers received "provisional allocations." They then had a set period to build or prepare the facilities to make the beds operational.

Once a provider held these allocations (often called "bed licenses"), they received government funding for every resident filling those spots. If a provider did not have an allocated place for a resident, they could not claim the government subsidy for that person's residential care.

The Shift to a New System

Following recommendations from the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety, the government decided to discontinue ACAR. The review found that tying funding to "places" rather than "people" limited consumer choice and competition.

Consequently, the system has transitioned away from allocating bed licenses to providers. The new model is often referred to as "Places to People." Under this new approach, residential aged care places are assigned directly to the senior citizen. This allows the older person to choose any approved provider they wish, and the government funding follows the person rather than staying with the facility.

Why It Matters

Understanding this concept is important for grasping the history and current structure of the Australian aged care sector.

• Historical Asset Value: For decades, bed licenses were considered valuable intangible assets for providers. They guaranteed a stream of government revenue and restricted competition in specific areas.
• Market Barriers: The system prevented an oversupply of beds but also made it difficult for new providers to enter the market or for high-quality providers to expand quickly.
• Facility Design: The Capital Grants component of the program was instrumental in funding the construction and upgrade of aged care homes, particularly in rural and remote areas where commercial loans were harder to secure.

Common Usage and Examples

While the program has ceased, you will still hear the term used in historical contexts or when discussing the transition of bed licenses.

• Example 1 (Historical Context): "The provider secured 40 new places in the 2020 ACAR to expand their facility in Queensland."
• Example 2 (Transition): "Since the cessation of ACAR, the provider no longer needs to apply for bed licenses to increase their occupancy; they focused instead on marketing to potential residents."
• Example 3 (Capital Works): "The rural facility relied on ACAR capital grants to refurbish their dementia wing."

Synonyms and Antonyms

Synonyms:

• Allocation Rounds
• Bed License Rounds
• Aged Care Allocation

Antonyms:

• Consumer-Driven Care
• Places to People
• Demand-Driven System

Related Concepts

• Bed Licenses: The specific rights granted to providers to receive subsidies for a residential place. These are being phased out.
• Places to People: The new system where government funding is attached to the individual senior rather than the facility.
• Capital Grants Program: Funding provided to help build or upgrade aged care premises, which was previously tied to the approvals round.
• Approved Provider: An organization that has met the regulatory requirements to deliver government-subsidized aged care.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ACAR still running?

No. The Australian Government has ceased the Aged Care Approvals Round. The last round occurred before the transition to the new "Places to People" model commenced. The allocation of residential aged care places is no longer determined through a competitive provider application process.

What happens to existing bed licenses allocated through ACAR?

With the transition to the new system, the concept of a "bed license" is being removed. Allocations are now assigned to the consumer. Existing provisional allocations held by providers have been part of a transition arrangement to ensure stability in the sector during the reform period.

How do providers get funding now without ACAR?

Providers no longer need to win competitive allocation rounds to receive subsidies for residential care. Instead, they must be an "Approved Provider." Once approved, they receive funding based on the number of eligible residents they admit and the care needs of those residents (determined by the AN-ACC funding model).

Does the cessation of ACAR affect home care?

The Approvals Round was primarily for residential aged care and short-term restorative care. Home Care Packages were already allocated directly to consumers before the cessation of this program. The removal of the round aligns residential care with the home care model, giving consumers more control across the board.

Navigating the Shift in Aged Care Allocation

The discontinuation of ACAR marks a fundamental shift in how the Australian government manages aged care supply. By moving away from a system where the government decides where beds are located, the sector is opening up to market forces and consumer preference.

For you as a stakeholder, provider, or observer, this means the focus has shifted from winning government tenders to delivering high-quality service that attracts residents. While the competitive application rounds are a thing of the past, their legacy remains visible in the distribution and size of many existing aged care facilities across the country. Understanding this history helps clarify why the sector is structured the way it is today and highlights the significance of the move toward a consumer-led future.

‍