‍Executive Summary

Aktrapid’s member survey of 237 frontline aged‑care workers reveals a nuanced relationship between documentation workload and quality of resident care. While 29 % of respondents believe paperwork does not impede care and 13 % say it does, a decisive 58 % offer conditional answers such as “sometimes” or “it depends.” Their views hinge on staffing levels, shift pressures, and system usability, underscoring that paperwork alone is not the true barrier; operational context is.

Key take‑aways:

• Documentation burden is context‑dependent. Care quality slips when paperwork collides with understaffing or clunky systems.
• Efficient digital workflows protect care time. When processes are streamlined, most staff feel documentation is both necessary and manageable.
• Targeted support beats blanket reform. Training, staffing ratios, and user‑centred tech design mitigate risk better than across‑the‑board paperwork cuts.

1. Background & Objectives

The July 1 Aged Care Quality Standards reform introduces heightened documentation requirements. Aktrapid surveyed its predominantly CALD workforce to understand frontline perceptions. This white paper isolates Question 4 – “Do you think the amount of paperwork and documentation will affect your ability to give quality care?” – to inform providers, regulators, and technology partners about the real‑world impact of compliance workload.

2. Methodology

• Sample: 237 respondents (72 % PCAs, 16 % RNs, 8 % ENs, 4 % other roles).
• Period: 28 May – 2 Jun 2025.
• Instrument: Online survey (Google Forms). Open‑ended text for Q4 coded into Yes / No / Conditional themes by two independent analysts.

3. Findings

3.1 The Mixed‑Response Majority

Five recurring qualifiers emerged:

1. Shift Pressure – Documentation overruns on high‑acuity or short‑staffed shifts.
2. Time Management Skills – Experienced nurses mitigate impact with routines.
3. System Efficiency – Digital tools that auto‑populate fields reduce friction.
4. Perceived Necessity – Staff accept paperwork as essential for safety and funding.
5. Staff Ratios – Adequate coverage allows concurrent care and compliance.

“If the EHR loads fast and we’re not two carers down, paperwork is fine. On a bad night, it’s impossible.” – PCA, 3 years experience

3.2 Correlations & Cross‑Cuts

• Tenure: Staff with <1 year experience most frequently selected “Yes,” suggesting onboarding support gaps.
• Role: PCAs were twice as likely as RNs to say paperwork hampers care, reflecting fewer administrative reserves and heavier resident interaction time.

‍

4. Discussion

The data indicate that compliance activities do not inherently erode care quality. In fact, many respondents acknowledged that documentation is essential to the delivery of safe, consistent, and high-quality care. Rather than being the problem, documentation is a critical tool for communication, legal protection, and most importantly, continuity of care; ensuring that the next staff member understands a resident’s history, preferences, risk factors, and current needs.

What the data reveal instead is that the true challenge lies in the conditions under which documentation is carried out. When staffing levels are adequate, systems are streamlined, and staff are supported, documentation is seen as both manageable and necessary. However, when aged care workers are understaffed, under time pressure, or burdened by inefficient or outdated systems, paperwork becomes a source of stress and an obstacle to resident interaction.

The 58% of respondents who gave conditional or mixed responses highlight a recurring truth: it’s not the presence of paperwork, but the absence of support structures that impairs care. Rigid processes, legacy software, lack of training, or inadequate rostering can all create a situation where staff feel forced to choose between finishing paperwork and attending to a resident’s immediate needs.

These operational frictions – not documentation itself – are what compromise care quality. Furthermore, calls to simply reduce the volume of paperwork risk undermining accountability, clinical accuracy, and team coordination. Instead of eliminating documentation, the focus should be on making it work better, through smarter digital platforms, embedded admin time, and role-specific support.

By reframing documentation as a clinical enabler rather than an administrative burden, aged care providers can ensure that compliance activities support, rather than compete with, person-centred care. When done well, documentation strengthens the continuity of care, empowers better clinical decisions, and helps multidisciplinary teams provide safer, more responsive, and more compassionate support to every resident.

5. Recommendations

1. Implement User‑Centred Digital Platforms
   Features: auto‑fill, voice‑to‑text, mobile entry, real‑time validation.
2. Allocate Protected Documentation Time
   Action: Embed short admin blocks within shifts, similar to medication rounds.
3. Adjust Staffing Ratios Dynamically
   Tool: Use acuity‑based rostering to anticipate paperwork peaks (admissions, audits).
4. Provide Targeted Training for New Staff & CALD Workers
   Method: Short bilingual micro‑learning modules on the new standards.
5. Monitor Documentation Load vs. Care Minutes
   Metric: Track EHR timestamps against resident interaction logs to flag imbalance.

6. Limitations

Open‑ended answers may reflect immediate sentiment rather than measured observation. Self‑selection bias could over‑represent tech‑savvy staff comfortable with online surveys.

7. Conclusion

Paperwork is a double‑edged sword: indispensable for safety and funding, yet a potential drain on direct care when operational support lags behind. Providers who streamline digital workflows, bolster staffing, and respect frontline perspectives can transform documentation from a hurdle into a safeguard of quality.